Tuesday, October 20, 2009

article paper #2 (10/28)

For class tomorrow, Wed. 10/21, please bring your first Article Paper so that we can review some vital issues and so that I can provide constructive remarks to the class.


For the second Article Paper, I would like you to follow the same format as the first assignment. Therefore, review the rubric for the first Article Paper if you need guidance.

Here are some general observations and criticisms I noticed from the first round of assignments that I'd like to share with you:

• in the introduction some were lost as to the direction and scope of their paper; be sure to compose effective intros which seek to accomplish what they set forth

• many students failed to draw a parallel between their quotes and the subsequent explanations; thus, I wanted most students to offer more in terms of explanation of their evidence and support

• many students left their quotes without proper introduction or prior explanation; remember, you cannot simply plop a quote into your paper, it needs to be adequately foregrounded.

• statements like “I believe that”, or “in my opinion” can be avoided; be more direct and just state that it is!

• offer/focus more on your analysis than your summary, as the former is more fruitful in terms of academic writing

journal #6 (10/26)

This next journal has been pushed back to Monday, Oct. 26 to allow you all adequate time to complete it. Also, you'll notice that the next Article Paper is due on Wednesday, Oct. 28th. Hence, you may wish to begin your external article research sooner than later.


Now, on with the journal assignment...

By the time this journal is due you should have read the three essays provided for Segment Two (Fiala, Bar On, Eide). Having done so, state your position on the just war front in regards to America's current military involvement(s). Do you feel that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are, have been, or will be justified? How so? Use one, two, or all three of the authors we have just read to support your statements and claims. If you can or feel compelled to do so, reply to a student's comment by offering further support/agreement or even a rebuttal/rejection.

Other things to consider regarding the topic: How do you view the theory of just war? Can such a theory even exist in our current technological, mechanical, pan-national globe when contrasted to the world of the past? What must we consider for a war to be just? And, crucially, who must we ask for justification and definition of warfare?

Other things to consider regarding the reading: How have one or all of these authors influenced your understanding and conception of war? Do you tend to agree/disagree with one over the other? What is a common thread that exists among two or all three of these authors?